tiistai 19. elokuuta 2014

Batman: Year One

So to start off my journey into the dark cave made completely out of the hundreds (or is it thousands?) of Batman comics ever published. I light up a torch and follow the tunnel that leads me further on, the floor under me making a ruffling sound as I stomp on the cheesy issues where Ace the bat-hound was first introduced.

Finally I reach my destination, the treasure I’m looking for right in front of me, shining on its pedestal. A wise man on the internet told me that this would be where I should start, and where I should first delve into the dark street of Gotham.

I pick up Batman: Year One, and start reading.


So, Batman: Year One. As the name suggests, this is clearly the comic that describes the first year of the Dark Knight as the protector of Gotham, and it seemed like a sane suggestion when random people on the internet said I should read it first.

Going into Year One, I was expecting something slightly different than what it is. Instead of being a collection of stories about his first encounters with his various villains, each story contained within itself and not interfering too much with the other stories, Year One offers shots from various days in the lives of Gotham. For example, the very first page starts out in the fourth of January, and on page six it skips forward to February 12th. Although at first confused, I grew accustomed to this style of storytelling fairly quickly and it grew on me.

The second surprise of Year One is that there are no supervillains. There’s no Joker, there’s no Clayface, not even Bane shows up to beat on the Batman. Instead the book concentrates more on Batman’s growth as a character and how he starts defining himself, and how he learns to properly be the Batman. The villain in the book throughout is the Falcone crime family, and although most of the action is centered around taking down the Falcones, it still isn’t the focus of the story.

It’s obvious that this whole book was crafted as a stepping stone for further Batman reading, and I do agree that anyone new to the comics should start with this one. However the story suffers from the same things that the Lord of the Rings books in parts did; there’s too much description of some events that no one cares about. In LOTR it was traveling through an open field with absolutely nothing in it, in Batman: Year One its Batman contemplating about him being Batman.

I still have to say, the book was a very good read. The depiction of the character is dark but not overly dark, and he has those human flaws that every character needs in order to be interesting. This isn’t some god descended down on humanity, this is a man with a set of extraordinary skills. He can take down an entire SWAT team, but not without facing real danger and taking some damage himself.


Overall, this was a very good book. I recommend you pick it up if you have the chance.

I'm the god-damn Batman!

NANA NANA NANA NANA NANA NANA NANA NANA BATMAAAAN!
If you didn’t figure it out yet, this post is about Batman. You know, the multimillioner who dresses up as a bat and goes around his city beating up shoplifters and the like. Thomas Wayne was his real name I think.

Joking aside, I haven’t admittedly newer really gotten into reading Batman. Yes, I said it, I haven’t read the Long Halloween or Knightfall, or even Year One. I’ve seen the movies, starting with Batman Forever (which was quite cheesy) to Dark Knight Rises. No, I haven’t seen the animated movies, but I did watch a lot of the animated series, not the old one but the new one that’s just called “The Batman”. Way to confuse people, eh?

In any case, I know you’re wondering why I’m telling you all of this. Well, it’s all to set the stage for a new serial blog thingie that I’m going to do about, you guessed it, Batman comics. Basically I’m just going to read through the Batman comics/story arcs listed below, and give you my opinion as someone who hasn’t read much Batman.

The list:
1.       Batman: Year One


2.       The Long Halloween


3.       The Killing Joke


4.       Dark Victory


5.       Hush


6.       Gotham by Gaslight


7.       Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on a Serious Earth



I’ll be putting up the first of these posts very soon, so keep refreshing that page!

sunnuntai 20. heinäkuuta 2014

What I thought of: Dawn of the Planet of the Apes

So just yesterday I went to see the long awaited sequel to the Rise of the Planet of the Apes. If you don’t know, this is a part of a sort of remake of the whole series, with Planet of the Apes being the first one (astronauts travel forward in time to find apes have taken over the earth), Rise of the Planet of the Apes being the second one (backstory to how the apes became intelligent and how most of humanity died), and the third one being Dawn of the Planet of the Apes. Needless to say, the two earlier movies were very, very entertaining to watch, and even posed some very good questions to the viewer such as “What separates a companion and a pet?”.  But can the latest movie in the series hold up this standard?

Yes. It definitely can.

To start off, the visuals of the movie are amazing. The body language of the apes looks very natural, and the images of San Francisco’s suburbs taken over by the forest are very believable. Throughout the movie you get a clear sense of presence, and you rarely get confused about where everything is happening. This sense of presence goes so far that I honestly think that I could probably draw a map of the movie locations off the top of my head. The reason you will not see one below is that I am horrible at drawing and also because I can’t be bothered.

Probably the worst part of the movie were main human characters. Very bland, I can’t even recall their names now. For some reason it feels like all the actually interesting human characters were kind of pushed to the side and didn’t get nearly enough screen time. With the humans being so bland, the focus of the film’s drama side turns to the apes. The apes are amazingly well done. Every single ape shown seems to have their own character, and the movie draws heavily on the backstories that were established in the earlier movie; Koba (Chimpanzee), who was used as a test subject by humans in the earlier movie carries a deep hatred that eventually leads him to war. Maurice (Orangutang) and Rocket (Chimpanzee) were held in a primate sanctuary where one of the keepers teased them for fun. Although they aren’t exactly fond of the humans either, they still follow Caesar (Chimpanzee) since he was the one who lead them out to freedom.

The story was fairly good as well, even though it did have some flaws. I’m not going to touch on it too deeply, but at its best it created an attachment between the viewer and Caesar’s son by comparing his experiences with one of the teenage humans’ experiences. At its worst, the story focused on some asshole who had a gun with him when he shouldn’t have, creating a random extra scene that the movie would’ve been fine without.


Final verdict: Go see this movie as soon as you can! (of course, remember to watch Planet of the Apes and Rise of the Planet of the Apes first)

Dawn of the Planet of the Apes on IMDB: www.imdb.com/title/tt2103281/

How'd you like the movie? Share your thoughts below!